Most incredible free gift ever

Posts Tagged ‘mail piece’

August 2000 Interview Between Dan and Bill (Pt 2)

By: Dan Kennedy on: December 7th, 2009 1 Comment

Bill: It takes about eight minutes to get out 10,000 messages, which is fascinating. Because Dan, as you know and we’ve had many discussions about this, my sales associates who work in my stores, they are required to make telemarketing calls to their previous clients, which is a very, very strong media which I highly encourage people to continue to do. But a good sales associate can make maybe, if he’s really good, maybe 20 calls an hour. Well, with voice broadcast, you can make 10,000 calls in eight minutes. So you can really hit the masses with this thing.

Dan: Okay. So this call was then made in follow-up to the Thanksgiving card. And in this case, it got you how much of a bump over the previous year?

Bill: This one was a little over a 35 percent increase in volume over the previous year. We did also follow it up with one more call. That call was done the day before Thanksgiving, and then I also followed it up with the Friday after Thanksgiving in the morning, with very similar message again. “This is Bill Glazer again. I just want to remind you that we sent you this special offer and you can shop in one of our two stores today, tomorrow or Sunday and get the special offer.” So we did do one more follow-up to it.

Dan: And did you have people coming in specifically mentioning having gotten the call?

Bill: Happens every time we do it. Now we’ve done it dozens of times. First of all, people mention that you get the call, because a lot of consumers really think it’s very ingenious. They really enjoy it. Also, a lot of consumers mention the special code word, because they no longer have the direct mail piece. They’ve throw that away. So you hear the code word very often. I’ll tell you one little almost humorous aside to this. If I’m out on the selling floor at one of my stores, invariably a customer walks up to me and says, “Are you the guy that leaves me those messages on my phone?” And I always turn to them with a big smile and say, “Yeah. And I only call you. You’re the only person I ever call.” Like you said, Dan, people really think that you’re calling them up. If you have a problem with that, you could say in your message, which I have one client doing now, same message, “Hi, this is whoever. I know these messages are annoying, but this information is just so important that I wanted to leave you this recorded message.” So if you have some kind of problem with that, you can certainly change your message to disclose that.

Dan: I imagine if we had open phones right now and the Gold members could ask you questions, one of the questions somebody would be bound to ask would be about the negative response to this.
(more…)

Critical Copywriting Strategies for Marketing a Small Business

By: Dan Kennedy on: October 23rd, 2009 4 Comments

Around here, on Planet Dan, we say “Copy Is King”…and we focus on the Message (and on Message To Market Match). But, as the highest paid professional, freelance direct-response copywriter working today, I can afford to tell you…and do tell you….things other copywriters will not. While it must be on target, copy gets credit for only 20% to 25% of a successful direct-mail piece/campaign, ad, web site, etc.

Another critical element is the ‘who’ reading the copy. In direct-mail, this makes careful, thorough, precision list selection and segmentation critical; in online marketing, it has to do with where traffic is being obtained from.

Then, another critical element is the presentation of the message. In face-to-face, person-to-person or person-to-group selling this may encompass the salesperson’s attire, personal appearance, body language and voice inflection; his props, visual aids, demonstrations; even the environment in which the selling is taking place. In media, there are seven major items on the Presentation of Message List.
(more…)

How To Rob People Legally and Leave ‘Em With a Smile on Their Faces

By: Dan Kennedy on: September 18th, 2009 9 Comments

A past issue of the Sunday New York Times included this article, headlined:

IS THIS CREAM WORTH $500.00?

Although I’m sure it was not the reporter’s purpose she prepared a marvelous marketing tutorial.

What’s in a name?

The company behind Deep Repair Facial Serum, Z. Bigatti, “a name that might conjure images of Milanese scientists…” – the owner, feet firmly planted in St. Paul, Minnesota, says his business partner just made the name up, because it sounded exotic and sexy.

Later in the article, a plastic surgeon, Dr. Brown, named his skin care company Re’Vive, which he admits is a contrived, bogus French name. He and his glop are from Louisville, Kentucky.
(more…)

The Power of Dimensional Mail in Small Business Marketing

By: Dan Kennedy on: August 6th, 2009 7 Comments

But why does dimensional mail work? Why does it increase response?

Well I’m convinced that the simple reason is because it adds a bit of intrigue to the mailing, which allows it to overcome the toughest task in small business marketing…getting your mail piece opened….getting your mail piece opened FIRST….and getting your mail piece read!

Piece by Bob Devol of Bob Devol Communications

I’m also convinced that the importance of using dimensional mail is rising due to the increased competition in the mailbox. Direct mail has to work harder than ever to stand out – and dimensional mail can help.

(more…)

Watching The Clock

By: Dan Kennedy on: June 9th, 2009 12 Comments

The ’secret’ reason long copy usually out-sells brief copy, and lengthy sales letters out-sell short ones is simply time. The longer the prospect stays in my store…

The more time he invests in my proposition, the more likely he is to buy.

The best catalogs are designed to keep the person paging through them for the longest possible amount of time. The best stores keep customers in them for the longest period of time possible – which the FAO Schwartz store in Vegas has tackled many different ways; three floors, slow escalators with brilliantly conceived signage that sells, the opportunity to buy 30-minute use cards to play all the games on the 3rd floor, the environment itself, a maze of specialty stores within the stores, salespeople who engage you (not clerks), even a soda fountain and sandwich/snack counter, so you need not leave for food. The best sales letters keep the reader reading for as long as possible. It’s why we use multi-media: letter, CD or DVD — it expands the amount of time the prospect invests with us. The best web sites are designed to involve the visitor and keep him there.

I’m amused when clients fall into the grip of competent technicians who are marketing nincompoops. The fools tell the clients that their sales videos should be no more than seven minutes long, audio CDs ten minutes at most. In one of my business fields, professional speakers are even fed this nonsense: keep your demo reel short. All the opposite of the ideal:

find ways to create so much interest

the person will stay with you, keep listening,

keep watching, keep reading.

The more time invested, more likely to buy.

In good old fashioned nose to nose, toes to toes, mug to mug selling, first in peoples’ living rooms, then B2B, in offices, I quickly learned what many such sales warriors know: likelihood of closing goes up in 15-20 minute increments. If I’m there for 2 hours, I’m not twice as likely to close as if there for only 1 hour, I’m three to four times more likely to close. That’s why the in-home guy selling pots

n pans or encyclopedias, etc. unpacks and has stuff strewn all over the place; it expands the time he’s there.

Of course, you can overstay welcome, unsell the made sale. In each selling situation — on stage, face to face, in a tele-seminar, in print, online, etc. — there is a specific “sweet spot” where sales peak; stop short or go long, suffer. For my basic

Magnetic Marketing’ speech, it was 90 minutes. I could get good results in as little as 70, up to 120. Less than 70 or more than 120, the sales drop off dramatically. But for the most part, most people stop way, way short of the point where maximum sales occur.

There is link between time invested and likelihood of buying.

The highest earning auto salesman I’ve ever known always took prospects to his office first, for conversation; then out to look at cars; then to test drive; then back to the office. Why not right out to look at cars? 15 more minutes. That’s why.

But what about…

Today’s shorter attention spans.

Age differences – younger buyers, shorter attention spans

My customer’s different… ..he’s very busy, won’t read a book…

Blah, blah, blah.

Look, all these things are real. Yes, today, everybody’s busier, there are fewer readers and fewer people reading as a matter of course, younger buyers do have shorter attention spans. But the correct answer is not to sacrifice what’s effective, not to merely surrender. The answer is to be more interesting and compelling.

A few years ago, ABC-TV was in the dumper. Fourth of the four networks, no hits. And series TV had given way to modular TV. Shows like CSI, CSI Miami, CSI New York, CSI Poughkeepsie, LAW & ORDER, LAW & ORDER SVU, LAW & ORDER CI, LAW & ORDER PMS, etc. are all designed so you do NOT need to follow them week after week. The story line begins and ends in each show. Each episode is self-contained and free-standing. And because of their success (as well as, admittedly, higher syndication longevity and value), the prevailing viewpoint in network television was that episodic, serial shows were dead. ABC, desperate for a breakthrough, went contrarian – and hits have emerged that are, in fact, serial: Desperate Housewives and Boston Legal, Sunday night winners.

My point is simply this: it’s less about modular or serial, as it is about interesting and compelling. And purely in terms of sales effectiveness, who’s evidencing greater power? — the writers, actors, etc. behind a show so fascinating viewers calendar it and make a point of being home to watch each episode, or those whose viewers feel comfortable with missing an episode?

Sometimes we are legitimately constrained by weight for a direct-mail piece, or space in print advertising, the 28 minute limit for the infomercial. But more often, marketers unnecessarily imprison themselves, with self-imposed time limits far short of their real time limits for their sales presentation and the prospect’s buying experience.

Sometimes we are legitimately constrained by very practical operational considerations. In my old seminar business, selling to chiropractors, dentists, podiatrists, optometrists and veterinarians, we found the 3 hour evening seminar far easier to get attendance for than the full day, and it allowed the speaker to travel each A.M., work every P.M., thus fitting five seminars and five cities into five days (vs. three in five if full days). So, essentially, operational considerations exerted control over sales considerations. But more often, operations controls sales when it shouldn’t. The first, best way of thinking is to determine what situation will optimize sales, then try and figure out how to create that situation. More often, marketers decide on the situation that suits them or their employees or fits some industry norm, then try to create sales within its parameters.

A mistake made at Caesars Palace: they built a gigantic, new 4,000 seat showroom for Celine Dion. Next to it, is a giant Celine Dion store of souvenirs, music, clothing, etc. But the people exit the showroom down steps next to the store. They should be forced to exit through the store. (Disney rides, like Tower Of Terror at Disney/MGM exit through the souvenir store.) This is minutes in a store, and minutes translate to money.

You have to look carefully at how you manage your prospects’ or customers’ time. There is a three way linkage:

Interest+Involvement+Time

Classic involvement devices in direct-mail include the “affix these stamps to the card” Publishers Clearinghouse kind of mailing pieces. Opening sealed envelopes. Taking quizzes and tests. Even a trick used by Sugarman (and others): find the misspelled words, get the right count, win a prize. Some of these classics can move online or into other environments; some can’t. In retail, such things as trying on clothes or test driving a car. Maytag is testing stores where you bring in laundry and do it there, or cook in the in-store kitchen. The retail chain (also with a store in the Forum Shops) that gets this done through demonstration is Houdini’s Magic Shop. On my team, EVERYBODY made a purchase there – and they held us for about 30 minutes. Including the red room/blue room gambit: buy now, we’ll take you behind the curtain, in the back room and teach you to do the trick.

In-home party plan selling is making a huge comeback. Here’s why I’ve always liked it: every single person who takes the time to go to an in-home party, goes intending to buy something and does buy something; coming home empty-handed would seem like a waste of time! But instead of a quick walk-through of a store, the person is kept for two hours. Most buy multiples, spend more than they intended – because of the two hours. And the involvement: interaction with the salesperson and other customers, demonstration, looking through catalogs together – involvement. For the party plan business, INVOLVEMENT + TIME equals sales.

So, things to think about -

How can you get your prospect more invested in getting ready to buy from you and in selling himself, so the sale is more automatic, the customer will buy more, will pay more?

How can you get your prospect to invest more time reading, listening, watching, visiting?

How can you actively involve your prospect?

How can you create a buying experience?

  • Twitter feed loading